Reading science fiction tales allows individuals with poor grip in English to improve their grammar skills. Talking and writing in broken English is the end result of not understanding how the arrangement of the English paragraph work. Through routine reading, you will learn the appropriate way to write a correct English sentence. There are sci-fi tales at different reading difficulty levels. You can begin in the one with easy reading difficulty level which has shorter length and then slowly advance to reading stories together with harder reading difficulty that have more length.
As you read the science fiction story, you will encounter words that you don’t understand. Every time you come across a challenging word, you should look up the dictionary and find out its meaning. If you did not buy a dictionary, you can use the online dictionary to look up the meaning of the word. You can discover how to announce the new word properly by playing the audio for the pronunciation in the internet dictionary. The more science fiction stories you see, the more wide your vocabulary will become.
Well, that depends on the kind of story you’re writing. The period of your tale will dictate the quantity of character information you’ll need to create them come to life. For simplicity’s sake, I have broken my character sheet down into what I use for each kind of writing. Your character sheets might vary.
Fiction by its very definition is unreal. When we see a novel we know that the narrative and the characters in it are only a product of imagination of the writer. When we see a movie we know that the characters are only acting their parts basically pretending to be somebody besides themselves. Still we’re emotionally affected by the turns and twists in the narrative. We laugh with them, weep with them, and even sense indignant towards the bad guys. The lovable hero or heroine may be despicable in actual life and the villain may be a perfect gentleman, but we identify them with the characters they are portraying. In essence for this brief period we get transported to the imaginary world of the writer. Strangely enough this happens too with the author at least to some of them. He or she travels through the very same emotions while writing and possibly later as well. Has what you have discovered added to your prior knowledge? here is a huge area with many additional sub-topics you can read about. We have found other folks think these points are helpful in their search. At times it can be tough to get a clear picture until you discover more. If you are unsure about what is required for you, then just take a better look at your particular situation.
The concluding talk will solidify what we have revealed to you up to this point.
“Knowledge is limited, imagination isn’t.” Albert Einstein said that although the wording of the second part could have been different. Einstein like any other human being wasn’t infallible. Some of his views he held right until the ending turned out to be wrong even in the subject of physics. In this particular announcement he also appears to have it backwards. Knowledge might be restricted in the case of someone but in general it is infinite even when we believe just rational understanding leaving apart transcendental. Science in particular has demonstrated this at every step in the course of its own development. Imagination pertains to an individual mind and is constrained by several factors based on the circumstances of the person. A mind can imagine only what happens in some way to matters already stored in it. Someone that has never been outside a remote place in wilderness and has had no contact with the world outside cannot imagine what metropolitan cities are like.
Getting back to fiction the imagination of the writer also must be predicated on his direct or indirect experiences. In this sense fiction is based on reality and to this extent it represents another dimension of reality. Here of course we run into the philosophical difficulty of the exact significance of reality. There are two diametrically opposite views – materialistic and spiritualistic. According to the former only things which can be perceived through our perceptions are real, everything else is unreal. The latter maintains that there is just one ultimate reality from which all that we perceive comes out and what that is perceived is simply an illusion. We again look at a statement by Einstein: “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one.” He was obviously referring to the fact of the phenomenal world. The word illusion can have different connotations but in general it means perceiving something rather different from what it really is. Therefore the presence of the thing is a prerequisite for illusion, it isn’t a mental construction. Imagination is purely a mental phenomenon and has nothing to do with whatever actually existent. Therefore the relationship between fiction and reality is entirely different from that between reality and illusion. It does take some time to write a complete story for any kind of book.
In a philosophical sense that the phenomenal world itself may be regarded as fiction. This is what Shakespeare possibly meant when he wrote: “All the world’s a stage, and all women and men merely players”. We may as well consider everything in the universe (space, time, issue) as players since everything has its entrance and exit. We of course run into the issue of stating what the stage is and who wrote the script. Shakespeare probably believed in God, strict determinism, and at the truth of the world, so he did not have this issue. Now it is generally thought that the universe also includes a beginning and will have an ending. If the world is also a participant, are there multiple universes or does it come alone on the stage and then introduces other players? But what’s the stage in this case? Quantum physics points to one possibility. At extremely tiny scales of space and time there is a quantum emptiness that’s not really empty but filled with energy which is constantly changing itself into virtual particles and back. What remains after the conclusion of the world could possibly be an infinite version of this quantum emptiness filled with energy into which all the matter has transformed itself. This universal energy is the source of and background for everything.
It isn’t merely a philosophical point. We spend a considerable part of our life from the fictional world. We muse about the items in future and live over the prior imagining what could have been. The imagination about the future is dependent on our hopes and aspirations and to some extent it is a positive in the sense that we are in a position to mould our future if we sincerely attempt. But musing within the past is really a futile exercise because we all know for a fact that ‘what might have been’ is only fantasy that never happened. Still it serves the exact same purpose as fiction from the point of view of amusement. We entertain ourselves by imagining how life would have been, knowing fully well that it has no fact whatsoever. In a metaphorical sense past, at the remote past, is fiction. At a certain sense history itself is fiction as it invariably includes the subjective bias of the writer. What we know of Buddha and Jesus now is more fiction than facts.